I’ve not used this blog much for personal note keeping; trying to stay on course as a technically oriented space. But maybe that’s not the only direction I should take?
Been thinking a lot about games lately; the definition of the word, the people fighting to define it, etc. So let me vex lyrically for a few lines about this. Disconnected, disjointed and even nonsensical sentences may follow.
A game is played. The “play” of a game is governed by rules. To play a game means to interact with the game and with other players of the game. The game rules govern these interactions. Without rules there is no interaction, without interaction there is no game. This is not specific to digital games but is applicable (and indeed was applicable first) to physical games. All “things” in real life are interactive because of the universe’s inherent physical rules. But not all things in the universe are games (though most interactions can be made into games). It follows then that the physical rules of the universe (or any) are not enough in and of themselves to render something a “Game”.
In science we perform experiments. These experiments are set in order to test particular results from given conditions. These experiments mimic universe rules and environments and allow those performing them to interact in order to see results. This is a simulation. An experiment is NOT a game (although, again, may turn into one). It follows then that simulations are not games; this is not to be confused with the ‘simulation’ game genre, something I’ll touch on later.
More ideas are bubbling around in my mind but alas I shall continue them later.
“I was in another lifetime one of toil and blood, when blackness was a virtue and the road was full of mud”